Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
24 March 2005 The First Record of a Pterosaur from the Early Cretaceous Strata of Öösh (Övörkhangai; Mongolia)
BRIAN ANDRES, MARK A. NORELL
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Although dinosaur fossils are common in the Early Cretaceous strata of Öösh, remains of other vertebrates are rare. Here we describe the first pterosaur fossil known from this locality. The specimen consists of a single vertebra that exhibits sufficient morphology to identify it as a nonazhdarchid tapejaroid pterosaur. Remains of such animals have been found in similarly aged rocks (some with accompanying similar faunas) throughout central Asia.

INTRODUCTION

During the 2000 field season of the Mongolian Academy–American Museum of Natural History Expedition to Mongolia, an isolated pterosaur cervical vertebra was collected from the Öösh locality in Övörkhangai Aimag. This vertebra represents the first record of pterosaurs at Öösh and the first pterosaur specimen collected by the Mongolian Academy of Sciences–American Museum of Natural History joint paleontological expeditions. Pterosaurs were previously known from only three localities in Mongolia (Unwin and Bakhurina, 2000). Tatal, in western Mongolia, has yielded the Early Cretaceous (Berriasian–Valanginian) remains of the dsungaripterid “Phobetorparvus (genus name preoccupied), Hüren Dukh, in eastern Mongolia, has yielded a large Early Cretaceous (Aptian–Albian) ornithocheirid, and Bakhar in central Mongolia has yielded a small, Middle Jurassic nonpterodactyloid, possibly anurognathid, pterosaur (Unwin and Bakhurina, 2000).

The Öösh locality was discovered in 1922 by Walter Granger of the AMNH Central Asiatic Expeditions (Andrews, 1932; see Watabe and Suzuki, 2000: fig. 1) (see fig. 1 herein). It consists of a desert hollow that lies about 40 km north of the Artsa Bogdo Range and 64 km west of the type section of the Djadokhta Formation at Bayn Dzak (“The Flaming Cliffs”), in the Altai region of central Mongolia (Berkey and Morris, 1927). Exposures stretch about 13 km from north to south, at least 24 km from east to west, and are dominated by a 3-km-long red mesa capped by basalt (Berkey and Morris, 1927). In 1922, the badlands of this area produced the holotype specimens of Psittacosaurus mongoliensis, the sauropod Asiatosaurus mongoliensis, and the theropod Prodeinodon mongoliense (Andrews, 1932). Gobiconodontids have subsequently been recovered from this locality (Rougier et al., 2001) as well as several other undescribed types of dinosaurs (Norell, personal commun.).

Institutional Abbreviations:

AMNH, American Museum of Natural History; IGM, Institute of Geology Mongolia.

Anatomical Abbreviations:

mh, median hypapophysis; nc, neural canal; ns, neural spine; pe, postexapophysis; pf, pneumatic foramen; po, postzygaphophysis; pr, postzygapophysis.

GEOLOGICAL CONTEXT

Öösh contains the type section and only locality of the Öösh Formation, an approximately 600-m-thick Early Cretaceous succession of red claystones, red sandstones, and black paper-shales (Berkey and Morris, 1927). The claystones and sandstones were interpreted as the sediments of a large alluvial fan deposited at the foot of an ancient mountain range, and the dark paper-shales as shallow lake sediments deposited at the foot of the developing fan system (Berkey and Morris, 1927). These strata lie uncomformably on top of the folded and partially metamorphosed rock floor of the Gobi region (Berkey and Morris, 1927). The rock units are slightly tilted and cut by numerous northward-striking normal faults (Berkey and Morris, 1927). In the Russian literature, the Öösh Formation is called the Tevsh Formation (see Jerzykiewicz, 2000). The Öösh Formation has most often been assigned to the Hüteeg Svita, Hüteeg Gorizont (Aptian–Albian), but, more recently authors have assigned it to the Öndörukhaa Svita, Tsagaantsav Gorizont (Berriasian-Valanginian) (Maryanska, 2000; Shuvalov, 2000).

The pterosaur vertebra comes from the “cannonball” beds (as defined in Berkey and Morris, 1927), a concretionary zone which forms the lowest part of the Öösh Formation. These beds are nearly 60 m thick and are composed of greenish-gray sandstones and siltstones that alternate with red siliceous clays and red concretionary sandstones (Berkey and Morris, 1927). These beds yielded the holotype of Psittacosaurus mongoliensis. The vertebra was found as surface float in the green siltstones.

The occurrence of Psittacosaurus is indicative of a Psittacosaurus bochron (Lucas, 2001). As Psittacosaurus is a ubiquitous fossil in radiometrically aged Early Cretaceous rocks throughout Asia, its established range is “Barremian to Aptian or possibly too as young as early Albian” (Lucas, 2001: 170).

SYSTEMATIC PALEONTOLOGY

PTEROSAURIA KAUP, 1834

PTERODACTYLOIDEA PLIENINGER, 1901

DSUNGARIPTEROIDEA YOUNG, 1964

ORNITHOCHEIROIDEA SEELEY, 1870

Tapejaroidea Kellner, 1989 incertae sedis Figure 2

Described Material:

IGM 100/1321 middle-series cervical vertebra with the dorsal portion of the neural spine missing.

Locality and Horizon:

“Cannonball” beds of the Öösh Formation (type area). Altai region, Övörkhangai Aimag, central Mongolia fig. 1).

Age:

Early Cretaceous (Berriasian–Valanginian or Aptian–Albian).

Description:

IGM 100/1321 measures 41.3 mm long, 20.1 mm at its middle width, and has a preserved height of 20.4 mm. As in all pterosaurs, this vertebra is procoelous, and as in all pterodactyloids, it lacks cervical rib facets. The body of the centrum is dorsoventrally compressed and constricted in its midsection. The lateral sides of the centrum are laterally excavated to house elliptical, presumably pneumatic, foramina. The concave anterior cotyle does not extend beyond the level of the anterior margin of the prezygapophyses, is separated from the prezygapophyses by a pair of troughs, and has a median hypapophysis projecting from its ventral margin. The convex posterior condyle, however, does extend beyond the level of the posterior margin of the postzygapophyses and has a pair of blunt postexapophyses projecting from its ventral margin. The neural arch is completely fused to the centrum.

The transverse process is constricted in midsection and is inclined anteroventrally with respect to the centrum. The articular facets of the postzygapophyses are steeply oriented lateroventrally, while the articular facets of the prezygapophyses are not preserved. Anteriorly, the neural canal is circular and lacks adjacent lateral pneumatic foramina. Posteriorly, the canal is subrectangular, laterally flanked by a small pair of dorsoventrally oriented fossae containing even smaller pneumatic foramina, and bordered dorsally by a small circular pneumatic foramen.

The dorsalmost part of the neural spine is missing. From the preserved portion, it is possible to determine that the spine ran the entire length of the neural arch, was relatively wide, and had a constant width along its length. Among existing pterosaur middle-series cervical neural spine morphologies, the preserved neural spine best corresponds with a tall and bladelike neural spine. The width of the neural spine at its break suggests that it extended to a much greater height than the low, or extremely low, neural spines of some pterosaurs. The constant width of the preserved neural spine in IGM 100/1321 corresponds more to the bladelike morphology found in most pterosaurs, rather than to the spike-shaped spines that decrease in width anteriorly, or the ridgelike spines that decrease in width toward their midsections found in other pterosaurs.

DISCUSSION

In the context of the phylogenetic analysis of Kellner (1996), an examination of the character states that can be determined in IGM 100/1321 identifies it as a nonazhdarchid tapejaroid (see fig. 3). This placement includes only taxa that are contained in the family Dsungaripteridae or the family Tapejaridae. A relatively short vertebral body and the presence of lateral pneumatic foramina identify this vertebra as belonging to a nonazhdarchid dsungaripteroid pterosaur, and the presence of postexapophyses identifies this vertebra as belonging to an ornithocheiroid pterosaur. Bennett (1994) reported that the pneumatic foramina lateral to the neural canal found in this specimen is also an ornithocheiroid synapomorphy. The only ornithocheiroids with tall and bladelike neural spines, as suggested by the preserved portion of the spine, belong to either the Dsungaripteridae or the Tapejaridae. Tall and bladelike neural spines are absent in the other two taxa within the Ornithocheiroidea, the Pteranodontoidea and the Azhdarchidae. Within the Pteranodontoidea the neural spines are spikelike, and within the Azhdarchidae the neural spines form extremely low ridges. If the characters of the neural spine are not considered, this vertebra would be placed as a nonazhdarchid ornithocheiroid.

To date, the tapejarids are known from the Early Cretaceous Santana Formation of Brazil (Kellner and Tomida, 2000) and the Early Cretaceous Jiufotang Formation of Liaoning Province of northeast China (Wang and Zhou, 2002). The dsungaripterid “Phobetorparvus from Tatal in western Mongolia and Dsungaripterus weii and Noripterus complicidens from the Junggar Basin of Xinjiang of northwest China have also been reported from the Early Cretaceous of central Asia (Unwin et al., 2000). Like the Öösh vertebra, the dsungaripterid “Phobetorparvus from Tatal, Mongolia, was found in the same sediments as Psittacosaurus, sauropod, and theropod remains (Bakhurina, 2001). Based on the morphology of the Öösh vertebra and its occurrence in Early Cretaceous sediments of central Asia, it is likely that it represents a dsungaripterid pterosaur.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jim Clark (George Washington University, Washington, DC) for finding this specimen and for helpful comments on earlier versions of the paper. Thanks go to Mick Ellison (AMNH) for his photographs of IGM 100/1321. We appreciate helpful discussions with Natasha Bakhurina and David Unwin (Museum für Naturkunde, Zentralinstut der Humboldt–Universität zu Berlin). We are also grateful to Xu Xing and the staff of the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Beijing, for access to their specimens. Reviews by David Eberth and James Schmidt improved the manuscript.

REFERENCES

1.

R. C. Andrews 1932. The new conquest of central Asia. Natural history of Central Asia, vol. I. New York: American Museum of Natural History, 691 pp. Google Scholar

2.

N. N. Bakhurina 2001. Hunting pterosaurs in Mongolia. In Two hundred years of pterosaurs: a symposium on the anatomy, paleobiology, and environments of Mesozoic flying reptiles. Strata 11: 12–14. Google Scholar

3.

S. C. Bennett 1994. Taxonomy and systematics of the Late Cretaceous pterosaur Pteranodon (Pterosauria, Pterodactyloidea). Occasional Papers of the Natural History Museum, University of Kansas 169:1–70. Google Scholar

4.

C. P. Berkey and F. K. Morris . 1927. Geology of Mongolia. Natural history of Central Asia, vol. II. New York: American Museum of Natural History, 475 pp. Google Scholar

5.

T. Jerzykiewicz 2000. Lithostratigraphy and sedimentary settings of the Cretaceous dinosaur beds of Mongolia. In M.J. Benton, M.A. Shishkin, D.M. Unwin, and E.N. Kurochkin (editors), The age of dinosaurs in Russia and Mongolia: 279–296. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

6.

S. S. Kaup 1834. Versuch einer Eintheilung der Saugethiere in 6 Stämme und der Amphibien in 6 Ordnung. Isis von Oken 1834:311–324. Google Scholar

7.

A. W. A. Kellner 1989. A new edentate pterosaur of the Lower Cretaceous from the Araripe Basin, northeast Brazil. Anais da Academia Brasiliera Ciências 61:4439–446. Google Scholar

8.

A. W. A. Kellner 1996. Description of new material of Tapejaridae and Anhangueridae (Pterosauria, Pterodactyloidea) and discussion of pterosaur phylogeny. Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University, New York, 347 pp. Google Scholar

9.

A. W. A. Kellner and Y. Tomida . 2000. Description of a new species of Anhangueridae (Pterodactyloidea) with comments of the pterosaur fauna from the Santana Formation (Aptian–Albian), northeastern Brazil. National Science Museum Monographs 17:1–135. Google Scholar

10.

S. G. Lucas 2001. Chinese fossil vertebrates. New York: Columbia University Press, 375 pp. Google Scholar

11.

T. Maryanska 2000. Sauropods from Mongolia and the former Soviet Union. In M.J. Benton, M.A. Shishkin, D.M. Unwin, and E.M. Kurochkin (editors), The age of dinosaurs in Russia and Mongolia: 456–461. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

12.

F. Plieninger 1901. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Flugsaurier. Palaeontographica 48:65–90. Google Scholar

13.

G. W. Rougier, M. J. Novacek, M. C. McKenna, and J. R. Wible . 2001. Gobiconodonts from the Early Cretaceous of Oshih (Ashile), Mongolia. American Museum Novitates 3348:1–30. Google Scholar

14.

S. Russell 2001. Chinese fossil vertebrates. New York: Columbia University Press, 375 pp. Google Scholar

15.

H. G. Seeley 1870. The Ornithosauria: an elementary study of the bones of pterodactyles. Cambridge: Deighton, Bell. Google Scholar

16.

V. Shuvalov 2000. The Cretaceous stratigraphy and paleogeography of Mongolia. In M.J. Benton, M.A. Shishkin, D.M. Unwin, and E.N. Kurochkin (editors), The age of dinosaurs in Russia and Mongolia: 256–278. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

17.

D. M. Unwin and N. N. Bakhurina . 2000. Pterosaurs from Russia, Middle Asia and Mongolia. In M.J. Benton, J.M.A. Shishkin, D.M. Unwin, and E.M. Kurochkin (editors), The age of dinosaurs in Russia and Mongolia: 420–433. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

18.

D. M. Unwin, J. L&uuml, and N. N. Bakhurina . 2000. On the systematic and stratigraphic significance of pterosaurs from the Lower Cretaceous Yixian Formation (Jehol Group) of Liaoning, China. Mitteilungen aus dem Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin, Geowissenschaftlichen Reihe 3:181–206. Google Scholar

19.

X-L. Wang and Z-H. Zhou . 2002. A new pterosaur (Pterodactyloidea: Tapejaridae) from the Early Cretaceous Jiufotang Formation of western Liaoning and its implications for biostratigraphy. Chinese Science Bulletin 47:201521–1527. Google Scholar

20.

M. Watabe and S. Suzuki . 2000. Cretaceous fossil localities and a list of fossils collected by the Hayashibara Museum of Natural Sciences and Mongolian Paleontological Center Joint Paleontological Expedition (JMJPE) from 1993 through 1998. Hayashibara Museum of Natural Sciences Research Bulletin 1:99–108. Google Scholar

21.

C. C. Young 1964. On a new pterosaurian from Sinkiang, China. Vertebrata PalAsiatica 8:221–256. Google Scholar

 Fig. 1. 

Map of Mongolia showing the geographical relationship of the Öösh locality to other Gobi fossil localities (modified from Watabe and Suzuki, 2000)

i0003-0082-3472-1-1-f01.gif

 Fig. 2. 

Photograph of IGM 100/1321 in A, dorsal; B, posterior; C, right lateral; D, ventral; E, anterior; and F, left posterolateral view. See text for a list of abbreviations. Scale equals 1 cm

i0003-0082-3472-1-1-f02.gif

 Fig. 3. 

Cladogram illustrating the phylogenetic relationships of the Pterodactyloidea as presented by Kellner (1996). The possible placement of the midcervical vertebrae, IGM 100/1321, is represented by the solid white lines. These lines mark the distribution of midcervical vertebrae with tall and bladelike neural spines, lateral pneumatic foramina, and postexapophyses within the Pterodactyloidea

i0003-0082-3472-1-1-f03.gif
BRIAN ANDRES and MARK A. NORELL "The First Record of a Pterosaur from the Early Cretaceous Strata of Öösh (Övörkhangai; Mongolia)," American Museum Novitates 2005(3472), 1-6, (24 March 2005). https://doi.org/10.1206/0003-0082(2005)472<0001:TFROAP>2.0.CO;2
Published: 24 March 2005
Back to Top